一个不落

　　A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
　　Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
　　This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
　　One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
　　- JohnHowardReid, imdb

　　剧情简介：
　　台湾南部小镇上，有个女子乐队，每天为婚丧嫁娶演奏，收入甚微。队员桂枝貌美聪慧，因家境贫困，到乐队吹奏乐器。乐队队长老猴子暗恋着她。乐队老板娘的侄子阿郎，长得英俊潇洒，不务正业，被不少女人追逐。他常到乐队与女队员厮混。老板娘不喜欢他，桂枝也瞧不起他。一次，桂枝看到阿郎为维护自己做人的尊严， 将一个女人送给他的汽车和衣物退还，遂改变了对阿郎的看法，两人开始恋爱而且有了孩子。但终因阿郎的不负责任，桂枝在伤心之余只好答应五 十多岁的老猴子的求婚。老猴子为桂枝还清其父母借老板娘两万余元的债务。不料一次桂枝偶遇阿郎，又重新燃起恋情，两人相偕到高雄谋生。阿郎开始洗心革面，力图负起养家的责任，但苦于无—技之长。为了糊口， 他摆起了西瓜摊，却被取缔。一气之下，他把西瓜摊砸个稀烂。几经波折，婚姻陷于绝境。最后他找到一份驾 驶货车运猪的工作，日夜冒着生命危 险开车赚钱。桂枝担心他的生命安全，以离开他作威胁，要他辞掉运猪的工作。阿郎不肯。桂枝坐火车上台北的那一晚，目睹阿郎驾驶运猪车欲超越火车而在车祸中丧生的惨景，痛不欲生。
　　获 奖：台湾中国影评人协会评为1971年最佳国语片第二位，同年获第九届金马奖最佳技术特别奖
　　《再见，阿郎》导演：白景瑞 1970
　　在尚未解严之前的年代，敢设法突破重重关卡，把陈映真的小说《将军族》搬上银幕已是异数。导演白景瑞将其意大利留学经验中的“喜剧”部分放弃，全然发扬“写实”的层面，非常深刻而有力道：一边镂刻底层小人物的相濡以沫，颇富30年代写实传统遗绪，一边又能对台湾60年代民风详加捕捉(例如本省人/外省人的和睦相处，以及农业转型时期盛行的“赛车送猪进城”)，可视为生活版的历史长卷。

　　帝国珍珠公司的镇店之宝，一粒名为“金星”的天然珍珠被盗。这粒“金星”的价值据说足以买下位于纽 约的一整栋办公大厦。案件曝光之后，帝国珍珠公司的股价暴跌。由此，帝国珍珠的会长岩仓寿三郎（西田敏 行 饰）和他的同父异母妹妹现任社长恒子（财前直见 饰）为了争夺社长之位展开激烈斗争。通过媒体 报道得知岩仓家庭内部矛盾的泽口信子（米仓凉子 饰）用散乱的头发和黑框眼镜隐藏了自己的美貌，以家政 妇的身份潜入岩仓家…
　　信子潜入岩仓家的目的非常明确。此前她去商场观看展出的“金星”时，曾遇到一个神秘男子。他似乎与 “金星”和岩仓家都有某种渊源，看到信子美得如同从荷兰画家弗美尔笔下的《戴珍珠耳环的少女》，就劝信 子把“金星”戴上试试。考虑到周围有很多其他顾客和记者，信子不假思索地拒绝并离开现场，但她珍视的珍 珠耳环却不翼而飞。据售货员说，珍珠耳环被神秘男子拿走了。怀疑神秘男子与“金星”被盗案相关的信 子认为，神秘男子一定会出现在岩仓家，而岩仓家居然也有一幅与神秘男子十分相似的肖像画。这名神秘男子 到底是什么人？
　　随着会长和社长的明争暗斗进入白热化，帝国珍珠的股价莫名地持续上涨…“金星”到底是在哪里被盗？又是如何被盗？窥探到大家庭的秘密和阴谋的信子又将如何行动呢？

　　阿忠一觉醒来，发现自己死了。他看着太太和子女处理他的身后事，一家人围着尸体一边吃早餐、一边七嘴八舌，阿忠也在旁边喋喋不休，但不论生前或是死后，他讲的话都没人听！他只能委托一个人，完成他最后心愿。